Dave Simon, author of MEATONOMICS: “There are a couple of problems with the so-called controversy that Taubes and others claim exists. First, their critiques of the underlying science focus on observational studies, which admittedly have flaws. But they ignore hundreds of other studies based on better science, such as those discussed in The China Study that show that even the tiniest amounts of animal products in the diet initiate tumor development, and when animal products are replaced with plant products in the diet, tumor development is turned off. Second, meat proponents typically focus on one constituent of animal foods: saturated fat. But animal foods contain other components known to be dangerous, such as heme iron and cholesterol – and of course steroids and antibiotics in industrially raised foods. So meat proponents engage in same logical fallacy of faulty generalization as do climate deniers who believe they can dismiss warming trends by pointing to a single cold day or one glacier that is growing instead of shrinking. Let’s not forget that Robert Atkins, the founder of the Atkins diet, died from complications associated with meat consumption.”
Dr. Preston Estep: “The claim that saturated fat doesn't promote disease is not credible. Most saturated fats raise both LDL and HDL, but, as I explain in TMD, high LDL is a causal factor in heart disease (especially in the presence of pro-oxidants like iron), while it has been shown in a few different ways that HDL plays no causal role, and is only a passive biomarker. This is new but increasingly accepted science. That isn't to say that higher saturated fat doesn't protect against certain conditions (e.g. stroke), but it does so at the expense of increasing other disease risks and all-cause mortality. Iron oxidizes LDL, so LDL together with high iron is much more problematic than high LDL with low iron, which is why non-meat sources of saturated fat are safer than fatty meat.”
From a link provided by Gary Taubes: “Take as many people as we can afford, randomize them into two groups — one that eats a lot of red meat and bacon, one that eats a lot of vegetables and whole grains and pulses-and very little red meat and bacon — and see what happens. These experiments have effectively been done. They’re the trials that compare Atkins-like diets to other more conventional weight loss diets — AHA Step 1 diets, Mediterranean diets, Zone diets, Ornish diets, etc. These conventional weight loss diets tend to restrict meat consumption to different extents because they restrict fat and/or saturated fat consumption and meat has a lot of fat and saturated fat in it. Ornish’s diet is the extreme example. And when these experiments have been done, the meat-rich, bacon-rich Atkins diet almost invariably comes out ahead, not just in weight loss but also in heart disease and diabetes risk factors. I discuss this in detail in chapter 18 of Why We Get Fat, “The Nature of a Healthy Diet.” The Stanford A TO Z Study is a good example of these experiments. Over the course of the experiment — two years in this case — the subjects randomized to the Atkins-like meat-and bacon-heavy diet were healthier.”
No comments:
Post a Comment
Please comment and subscribe.